SO Ive also read that βidle tempsβ on a PC doesnt men much, what matters is the temps when its actually doing something. SO I ran Prime95 to stress test my CPU , and after 15 mins of it the temps stays between 79-88c soo I say things are looking good? >.>
Laptop Update
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Antoinehow do we know if I did or didnt use sufficient thermal paste?
You said -
My only worry is I may not have applied enough thermal paste. The dot is used was like no bigger than or barely bigger than a thread or maybe close to a grain of rice. (but Im sure it wasnt even THAT big)
Rule Of Life -
It isnβt wrong until it leaves your desk.Comment
-
Originally posted by AntmanβWeβ do not know anything. I only know what you tell.
You said -
A good tech always double checks.
Rule Of Life -
It isnβt wrong until it leaves your desk.Comment
-
Originally posted by AntoineSO Ive also read that βidle tempsβ on a PC doesnt men much, what matters is the temps when its actually doing something. SO I ran Prime95 to stress test my CPU , and after 15 mins of it the temps stays between 79-88c soo I say things are looking good? >.>
For CPU stress and heat testing, Prime95 is best used with a BLEND test for two to four hours. Small or Large FFT tests for 12 to 24 hours.
In your situation, I would run a BLEND test for two hours.
FurMark testing of the GPU for 15 minutes is sufficient. I caution against a FurMak test until after you address the GPU cooling. Again, GPU heat kills many more laptops than CPU heat.Comment
-
Originally posted by Antoinewell if weβre being honest since I noticed my CPU was rectangular instead of square or round like the ones in most the videos and its smaller (both in length and thickness) than the βPost Replyβ button on this page. I determined that a dot wouldnt spread much on that shape (and was also told that unlike a PC CPU where 100% spread isnt a defacto requirement, with a laptop CPU 100% spread is a necessity) decided instead to use an extreme thin line method. SO because of that (and the cooler temps) I have reason to believe it must have spread sufficiently, also due to the small size of the cpu Im almost sure that if I applied anything thicker its 100% guaranteed to run off the silver part of the CPU and only the green parts an thats supposedly bad right?Comment
-
Originally posted by AntmanTemps that high are not unusual in a stressed laptop, and are nominally acceptable, but I would not be happy with that result. Sufficiently and correctly applied, thermal compound performance will improve over time.
For CPU stress and heat testing, Prime95 is best used with a BLEND test for two to four hours. Small or Large FFT tests for 12 to 24 hours.
In your situation, I would run a BLEND test for two hours.
FurMark testing of the GPU for 15 minutes is sufficient. I caution against a FurMak test until after you address the GPU cooling. Again, GPU heat kills many more laptops than CPU heat.
Also βTemps that high are not unusual in a stressed laptop, and are nominally acceptable, but I would not be happy with that result.β Now unless Im interpreting this wrong. That tells me those temps are perfectly fine, theyre just not good enough for YOU. Surely you notice the difference in those two things right? Some people are ok with βperfectly fineβ or βwithin acceptable parametersβComment
-
Originally posted by AntmanYou have received professional guidance. What you do with it is a choice.Comment
-
so I just tested the most graphically intensive game I have (in fact its the only game I have) which used to run on my laptop at MAX PC (yes PC not laptop) settings just fine on day one. That over the years got so had that I have to play it on standard settings to that it isnt stuttering and dipping below 15FPS. Now with the CPU thermal paste application and net GPU and CPU fans, the game is running at MAX PC settings just fine again while the CPU temps stay between 40-50C and the GPU gets no higher than 93c the FPS (which goes above 60 on lower settings, stays between 32-28 on max⦠which 95% of the time stays at 30+) what would you say of those temps and performance?Comment
-
At 93C, you are within 2C of the max operating temperature of the 780M chip design reference. Any improvement in GPU cooling will also improve CPU cooling, and vice versa. It is a system.
My goal is to assist in the diagnosis and repair of technical issues and to impart a thorough understanding of the relevant principles and dynamics involved. I am not here to proselytize, but I will argue that you may be pursuing the wrong goal. Frame rates and game settings do not matter - they are free and inconsequential and will not fail or fry as a result of heat stress and damage. But, your laptop will. This thread, and its related thread, is about heat related systems failure - not gameplay.Comment
-
Originally posted by AntmanAt 93C, you are within 2C of the max operating temperature of the 780M chip design reference. Any improvement in GPU cooling will also improve CPU cooling, and vice versa. It is a system.
My goal is to assist in the diagnosis and repair of technical issues and to impart a thorough understanding of the relevant principles and dynamics involved. I am not here to proselytize, but I will argue that you may be pursuing the wrong goal. Frame rates and game settings do not matter - they are free and inconsequential and will not fail or fry as a result of heat stress and damage. But, your laptop will. This thread, and its related thread, is about heat related systems failure - not gameplay.
Which means its confirmed that the gpu paste NEEDS to be replaced. Its no longer a suggestion at this point. See how easy that was? now i actually have an indisputable reason to do so.Comment
Comment