Honestly, I really want to know why this is the only rig I own that is showing RAM at the single data rate speed in Windows task manager and userbenchmark. I know that there are some who say userbenchmark is inaccurate, but it has never been inaccurate for me and I have been using it for over a year now on over 30 rigs personally. In reference to that guy’s post on Tom’s I had a similar situation arise with another Ryzen build in a Dell Inspiron where userbenchmark was saying it was clocked at 2133 (it was 2400 RAM without XMP made for Ryzen systems in my case) and updating the BIOS fixed that issue all on it’s own since that Dell doesn’t use XMP.
I don’t want to abuse your guys’ time cause you guys are doing an awesome service for the PC community here, so with that being said, mark this thread solved since we now have dual channel working with full RAM capacity. I’m going to continue to mess with it, and if I am successful in getting Windows task manager and/or userbenchmark to show 1600 MHz I’ll ask for the thread to be reopened so I can post what I did to accomplish this.
Thank you for your assistance yet again!
I don’t want to abuse your guys’ time cause you guys are doing an awesome service for the PC community here, so with that being said, mark this thread solved since we now have dual channel working with full RAM capacity. I’m going to continue to mess with it, and if I am successful in getting Windows task manager and/or userbenchmark to show 1600 MHz I’ll ask for the thread to be reopened so I can post what I did to accomplish this.
Thank you for your assistance yet again!
Comment