Where the UK’s **** ban falls short

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PCHF IT Feeds
    PCHF Bot
    • Jan 2015
    • 54578

    #1

    Where the UK’s **** ban falls short

    In December 2014 amendments were made to the 2003 Communications Act effectively censoring *********** within the UK. It banned a list of *** acts by demanding paid-for video-on-demand (VoD) online **** is regulated by the same guidelines set out by the British Board of Film Censors (BBFC) that DVD *********** (R18 films) must adhere to.

    To be specific strangulation, facesitting and fisting were deemed life threatening. Other acts banned included full bondage and restraint involving all limbs being restrained and the mouth gagged, aggressive spanking full bondage and restraint (in conjunction with a gag and all four limbs restrained) and finally the one that caused the most outrage bizarrely female ejaculation. Why is it ok for men to ********* but not women was cried from all ends of the UK?

    Did these bans help educate? Did they stop people viewing these types of ***********? Did it stop the mental health damage and detrimental effect **** has on the UK’s teenagers? No…So how exactly is the government’s new **** legislation, due to have come into effect in April but now delayed until 15th July, and designed to stop children and teenagers from accessing ****, expected to be any different? Particularly given that this legislation only seems to have been launched off the back of an NSPCC poll claiming that more than half of children and teenagers that looked at **** “stumbled across” it.

    [ul]
    [li]The legal ins and outs of the UK **** Block[/li][li]Myth busting: what the so-called “porn ban” really means[/li][li]Starbucks plans to block adult content on its Wi-Fi in 2019[/li][/ul]

    Yes, if you google **** of course it will appear but the fact is more children and teenagers are more exposed to **** via social media channels. Twitter for example is ripe with explicit uncensored videos, this legislation will have no effect on accessing **** via social media channels.

    Education trumps legislation

    On launching this new legislation, Minister for Digital Margot James said “Adult content is currently far too easy for children to access online. The introduction of mandatory age-verification is a world-first, and we’ve taken the time to balance privacy concerns with the need to protect children from inappropriate content. We want the UK to be the safest place in the world to be online, and these new laws will help us achieve this.” In my opinion, “they won’t Margot they really really won’t!”

    The government is simply putting a plaster on a deep cut that will not be cured by simply applying a plaster. The cut will inevitably get deeper and infection will kick in. I am not, in any way anti ****. I am however anti the lack of education surrounding ****, specifically within schools.

    Teenage boys get to see unrealistic ****** acts and assume that is how girls behave, what girls want and therefore expect it from their female peers, all whilst teenage girls think that this is how they should behave, how they should let boys treat them and that *** is all about the male pleasure.

    Dr Vanessa Moulton of The Mindflex Group said “children are so curious, especially when they reach teenage years and puberty. With potential access to **** online, it can become their focal point of *** education and can impact their developing brains. Because of neuroplasticity and the developmental stage of the brain between teenage years, their brains can become wired in relation to their attitudes and interpretations of what *** means to them. It can also result in unrealistic expectations when they encounter ****** experiences.”

    Until the dialogue and education is changed regarding ****, until the dialogue stops putting the responsibility onto girls thus excusing boys behaviour and actually begins to teach boys about consent, boundaries and how **** is not the real world, then no amount of legislation will help or change the narrative of reality.

    [IMG alt="NtQgopRbkgZAyZ973AhjoP" width="690px" height="387px"]https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NtQgopRbkgZAyZ973AhjoP.jpg[/IMG]

    Image credit: Shutterstock

    Workarounds will be found

    There are simply millions and millions of **** sites and if the UK is the only country with these new blocks on then anyone with VPN, which makes it look like you are in another country, can simply get around it. As with anything illegal it will just push teenagers into the darker web to find **** thus exposing them to disturbing and extreme content and ironically making the whole **** effect even more damaging.

    This is before you take into consideration the massive privacy and GDPR headache involved with the new legislation requiring everyone viewing **** to be age verified submitting personal information details and the rest. Who is handling all this personal information? Where exactly is all that information being stored? The invasion of privacy is huge and surely that has hackers written all over it? Any tech savvy teenager can illegally stream unlimited ****, get around age restriction logins whilst sticking two fingers up to the law on their YouTube, Snapchat and Instagram stories, these laws will not prevent children from viewing ****. Frankly, where there is a will there is always a way

    It is a NO from me.

    Emma Sayle, Founder and CEO of Killing Kittens, Safedate and Sistr

    [ul]
    [li]This is everything you need to know about the UK’s **** block[/li][/ul]


    Continue reading…
Working...